2011-2012 Teacher Performance Assessment Document

Does anyone know how to attach a file to a post?  I see where you can create a link to something on the web, but I wanted to upload the current eval document here.  I find this odd....Oh well, I will upload the file to the PD360 group.

peace out~

K. Miller Goal Setting Draft

 This is my attempt...thanks so much for sharing....it helped a lot!

Goal Setting for Student Progress Form

Roanoke City Public Schools

Teacher’s Name: Kelly Miller 

Evaluator’s Name: Stephanie Hogan 

Subject/Grade: Mentor                                                                                                School Year: 2011 -2012

Initial Goal Submission (due by 9/30 to the evaluator)

I. Setting (Describe the population and special learning circumstances)	I work at a Title I urban middle school with 38 classroom teachers.  16 of those teachers have less than 3 years experience with RCPS and are on my caseload.  5 of those teachers are Probationary 1 and have no prior teaching experience. 3 teachers are Probationary 1 with several years of teaching experience, but are new to RCPS.  3 teachers are Probationary 2 with one year teaching experience.  One teacher is Probationary 2 with several years teaching experience, but is not on continuing contract status as of yet.  One teacher is Probationary 3 with 2 years teaching experience, and three teachers are Probationary 3 with several years teaching experience, but have not earned continuing contract status as of yet.
II. Content/Subject/Field Area (The area/topic addressed based on learner achievement, data analysis, or observational data)	RCPS Teaching Standards:  Five probationary 1 teachers will self-assess current teaching practice using the  RCPS Teacher Performance Assessment by October 15, January 15, and March 10.
III. Baseline Data (What is shown by the current data?)	Teaching Standard       % Emerging     % Proficient Knowledge of Students and Content Instructional Planning Instructional Delivery Assessment of and for Student Learning Safe and Effective Learning Environment Communication, Collaboration and Professionalism Student Academic Progress  Data attached
IV. Goal Statement (Describe what you want learners/program to accomplish)	Each teacher will make measurable progress for at least two Teaching Standards as evidenced by results of self-assessment using the RCPS Teacher Performance Assessment and NTC Formative Assessment Tools used between mentor and mentee.
V. Means for Attaining Goal (Strategies used to accomplish the goal)
Strategy	Evidence	Target Date
Consistent and collaborative use of NTC Formative Assessment System tools targeting specific areas of growth and strategies used to improve teacher identified aspects of professional practice.	Self-Assessment Data, FAS Tools	Weekly and ongoing
Observe a veteran colleague together and debrief afterwards.	FAS Tools, Schedule, Blog	12/15/2011
Provide resources and collaboration, including embedded professional development and literature analysis targeting specific areas of growth for teacher- identified aspects of professional practice.	PD360 log, FAS Tools, Presentations, Blog	Ongoing
Ask questions that examine issues of equity.	FAS Tools, Blog	12/15/2011
Co-Plan, Model, Co-Teach	Lesson Plans, FAS Tools	Ongoing
Analyze student data and student work samples together	RtI Model, FAS Tools	10/15/2011 and ongoing

Approval of Goal

Goal Setting Rubric
Level of Performance
Unsatisfactory	Emerging	Proficient	Exemplary
Not Applicable CANNOT MOVE FORWARD	Not Applicable CANNOT MOVE FORWARD	Student learning and academic achievement goals are rigorous, attainable and reflect acceptable growth during the course or school year	Student learning and academic achievement goals are rigorous, attainable and reflect extraordinary growth beyond expectations during the course or school year
Student learning and academic achievement goals are unrelated to identified student needs.	Student learning and academic achievement goals are related to identified student needs, but S.M.A.R.T. process needs refining.
Comments:

Signatures

Sign form after formative feedback has been provided and goal has been revised, if necessary.

Teacher’s Signature _____________________________________________        Date                             

Evaluator’s Signature ____________________________________________       Date                             

VI. Mid-Year Review (Describe goal progress and other relevant data)	Mid-year review conducted on____________ Initials:         _____(teacher)     _____(evaluator)
	Data attached

Teacher’s Signature _________________________________________  Date _____________________

Evaluator’s Signature ________________________________________ Date _____________________

End-of-Year Review 

 Appropriate Data Received   

Strategies used and data provided demonstrate appropriate Student Growth      Yes   No

Evaluator’s Signature ________________________________________ Date _____________________

Honaker Goal Setting Form

Goal Setting for Student Progress Form

Roanoke City Public Schools

Teacher’s Name: Beverly Honaker 

Evaluator’s Name: __________________________________________ 

Subject/Grade: Mentor                                School Year: 2011-2012

Initial Goal Submission (due by 9/30 to the evaluator)

I. Setting (Describe the population and special learning circumstances)	I will be working with Probationary 1 (new) teachers weekly and Probationary 2 & 3 teachers bimonthly or monthly depending upon their needs for support.
II. Content/Subject/Field Area (The area/topic addressed based on learner achievement, data analysis, or observational data)	Mentee growth on Roanoke City Public Schools teaching standards.
III. Baseline Data (What is shown by the current data?)	Individual mentee data will be based on self-assessments as selected by Mentor/Mentee in which weakest performance standards are listed.  (2 teachers were emerging on standard 2, 1 teacher was emerging on standard 6, and 1 teacher was emerging on standard 7).  Data attached
IV. Goal Statement (Describe what you want learners/program to accomplish)	Using the Roanoke City Teacher Performance Assessment, 85% of assigned new and probationary teachers will increase their performance level by one in at least 2 of the standards as selected by Mentor/Mentee.
V. Means for Attaining Goal (Strategies used to accomplish the goal)
Strategy	Evidence	Target Date
*Weekly/Monthly Conferences with probationary teachers.	Use of NCT tools:  CAL, Seating chart, Observation Record, etc.	Weekly:  September - May 2012
*Training as needed for Mentees      in goal setting, instructional methods, technology, data retrieval and disaggregation.	*Documentation of training in weekly conferences on CAL form.	Weekly:  September – May 2012
*Weekly journaling with Mentee teachers.	*Blogs created using Blogger.com where Mentor and Mentee can have a weekly confidential conversation assessing needs and goals.	*Weekly:  September – May 2012

Approval of Goal

Goal Setting Rubric
Level of Performance
Unsatisfactory	Emerging	Proficient	Exemplary
Not Applicable CANNOT MOVE FORWARD	Not Applicable CANNOT MOVE FORWARD	Student learning and academic achievement goals are rigorous, attainable and reflect acceptable growth during the course or school year	Student learning and academic achievement goals are rigorous, attainable and reflect extraordinary growth beyond expectations during the course or school year
Student learning and academic achievement goals are unrelated to identified student needs.	Student learning and academic achievement goals are related to identified student needs, but S.M.A.R.T. process needs refining.
Comments:

Signatures

Sign form after formative feedback has been provided and goal has been revised, if necessary.

Teacher’s Signature _____________________________________________        Date                             

Evaluator’s Signature ____________________________________________       Date                             

VI. Mid-Year Review (Describe goal progress and other relevant data)	Mid-year review conducted on____________ Initials:         _____(teacher)     _____(evaluator)
	Data attached

Teacher’s Signature _________________________________________  Date _____________________

Evaluator’s Signature ________________________________________ Date _____________________

End-of-Year Review 

 Appropriate Data Received   

Strategies used and data provided demonstrate appropriate Student Growth      Yes   No

Evaluator’s Signature ________________________________________ Date _____________________